PUBH6001: Health Policy and Advocacy

ASSESSMENT BRIEF
Matter Code and Title
PUBH6001: Sanity Plan and Advocacy
Assessment
Duty 2: Plan Resolution Oration
Individual/Group
Individual
Length
2000 expression (+/-) 10%)
Lore Outcomes
This duty yarnes the subjoined lore outcomes:
Analyse incongruous theories and adites to plan agenda setting
Devote scholarship of plan product to a public sanity plan result
Analyse results in coeval Australian sanity economy plan
Unfold regularityes control the evaluation of and
accountability control plan
Critique the role of networks and coalitions in the plan agenda setting regularity
Submission
Sunday of week 8 at 11.55pm*
Weighting
40%
Total Marks
100 marks
*Gladden Referablee: This age is Sydney age (AEST or AEDT). Gladden turn to your admit age zundivided (eg. Adelaide = 11:25pm).
Instructions:
In this Duty, you obtain buy in plan resolution. Choose a sanity plan (either prevalent or spent), either at the specify or federal flatten, to analyse in this Assignment (eg, unsubstantial sanity plan, women’s sanity plan,
preventative sanity plan, men’s sanity plan, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander sanity plan).
The Assignment should be approximately 2,000 expression (+/- 10%) and presented in oration controlm. Yarn the subjoined questions in your Duty yet gladden do referable repartee the questions as a succession of brief repartees:
Firstly, afford a brief entrance to your oration. Then returns to analyse your chosen plan, and in doing so, regard the subjoined results:
The Quantity and Composition
•Describe the prevalent and truthful plan comcollocation of the quantity.?
•What is the quantity which the plan seeks to yarn?
What quantitys are palliablelighted???
•What quantitys own been unremembered??
Fabricate of Intimation/Dominant Yarn
•What is the spiritless fabricate of intimation or dominant yarn declaration amid this plan???
•Are fixed expression and phrases spiritlessly explanationd???
•Are there any underlying assumptions after these??
Targets, Stakeholders and their Justice
•Who is the target of the plan (the matter of the yarn)???
•Who are the other stakeholders verified in the plan? Describe clew institutional structures, agencies and workforce compatability construction.?
•How are the matters of the plan nature represented???
•How are incongruous collective groups portrayed in this plan and what implications does this own??
•Are there any spiritual judgements open in this justice??
Plan regularity
•Who were the stakeholders implicated in the product of the plan? Who was unremembered??
?•Whose interests were represented in the product of the plan? Which voices were referable heard???
•What were the virtual competing interests and susceptibility incongruousials of those implicated in the product of the plan???
•What was the motivation control stakeholders in creating this plan???
•Were there any detail windows of convenience that enabled the product of this plan??
Plan Solutions
•What solutions are deposit controlward to yarn the quantitys?
What choice solutions energy own been unremembered??
•Are there any collective/power/ethical implications of this plan?
Effectiveness
•Regard the implementation of the plan. How efficiently do you conceive the prevalent plan has been implemented???
•What are the accountability regularityes control the plan???
•Regard evaluation measures (indicators) and any evaluation which has been undertaken.
•How efficient has the plan proven to be?
Finally, complete your oration with a misrecord.
Duty Criteria:
• Scholarship and construction of the plan result (30%)??
• Important resolution of the quantity, fabricates of intimation explanationd, the plan regularity
• and plan solutions (30%)??
• Collision and collocation of scholarship environing plan theories (25%)??
• Public Duty Criteria (15%) Duty fulfills public academic standards, including:
• Afford an entrance and misrecord
• Complies with academic standards of message, including legibility, clarity, servile spelling, grant and phraseology.
• Explanations expend APA 6 mode control citing and referencing elimination
• Upholds standards of academic truthfulness, as explaind by delectable fame from text-matching software (e.g Safe Assign).
Marking Rubric:
Duty attributes F2 0-34 F1
35-49 Pass 50-64 Credit 65-74 Distinction 75-84 Palliable Distinction (HD) 85-100
Grade description
Declaration of inconsiderable cheerful-fortune of undivided or past of the lore objectives of the matter, inabundant construction of the matter resignededed and/or inconsiderable flatten of opportuneness product.
Declaration of grateful cheerful-fortune of matter lore outcomes and abundant scholarship and important resolution opportunenesss.
Declaration of a cheerful flatten of construction, scholarship and opportuneness product in harmony to the resignededed of the matter. Demonstration of a cheerful flatten of important resolution. Declaration of a palliable flatten of cheerful-fortune of the lore objectives explaind in such areas as rendering and important resolution, tokenative token, explanation of methodology and message opportunenesss.
Declaration of an abnormal flatten of cheerful-fortune of the lore objectives resisting the all resignededed of the round explaind in such areas as rendering and important resolution, tokenative token, creativity, originality, explanation of methodology and message
skills.
Scholarship and construction of the
plan result (30%)??
The duty does referable explain scholarship or construction of the
plan result.
The duty explains some scholarship and construction of the plan result, yet this is scant. Claims respecting the plan are anecdotal and referable courteous-mannered-mannered linked to withhold lore (either grey or comrade re-examination). The duty explains a cheerful flatten of scholarship and construction of the plan result. This is reasonably courteous-mannered-mannered linked to withhold lore. The duty explains a palliable flatten of scholarship and construction environing the plan result. This construction is courteous-mannered
protected by withhold
literature. The duty explains an abnormal flatten of scholarship and construction environing the plan result. This construction is very courteous-mannered-mannered protected by withhold lore, which shows big elimination has been conducted.
Important resolution of the quantity, fabricates of intimation explanationd, the plan regularity and plan solutions
(30%)??
The duty does referable explain any
important resolution. The duty explains some attempts at important resolution, yet the argument of the plan quantity, fabricates, plan regularity and plan solutions is in-great-measure pictorial. The duty explains a culm important resolution of the plan, including the plan quantity, fabricates of intimation, plan regularity and plan solutions. Choice ways to adit the plan result are arguments. The duty explains a very cheerful important resolution of the plan, with an resolution of the plan quantity, fabricates of intimation, plan regularity and plan solutions that regards choice ways to adit this
plan result. The duty explains a courteous-mannered-mannered open and broad important resolution of the plan, with an resolution of the plan quantity, fabricates of intimation, plan regularity and plan solutions that regards choice ways to adit this
plan result.
Collision and collocation of scholarship environing
plan theories (25%)??
The duty does referable explain any collision of plan theories.
The duty displays attempts to devote plan theories in the argument of the plan result. The construction of plan theories is scant.
The duty displays a culm collision of plan theories in the resolution of the plan result.
There are some inferior limitations in scholarship of plan theories. The duty displays a very cheerful collision and collocation of plan theories in argument the plan result. This explains a very cheerful flatten of construction of plan theories. The duty displays an palliable collision of plan theories in the argument of the plan result. The argument explains an palliable and broad scholarship of plan theories.
Public Duty
Criteria (15%) Duty fulfills public academic standards, including:
Afford an entrance and misrecord Poorly written with errors in spelling, phraseology.
The duty has no
entrance or
conclusion.
Demonstrates Is written according to academic genre
(e.g. with entrance, misrecord or tabulation) and has
servile spelling, phraseology, decree and Is courteous-mannered-written and adheres to the academic genre
(e.g. with entrance, misrecord or
summary).
Demonstrates Is very courteous-mannered-written and adheres to the
academic genre.
Consistently explains opportune explanation of cheerful temper, likely and withhold elimination Opportunely written and adheres to the academic
genre.
Demonstrates opportune explanation of palliablequality, likely and withhold elimination
Complies with academic standards of message, including legibility, clarity, servile spelling, grant and phraseology.
Uses expend APA 6 mode control citing and referencing elimination
Upholds standards of academic truthfulness, as explaind by delectable fame from text-matching software (e.g Safe
Assign).
inaccordant explanation of cheerful temper, likely and withhold elimination sources to living and unfold ideas.
There are mistakes in
using the APA mode.
There may be questions respecting the academic
truthfulness of the duty. paragraph
construction.
Demonstrates accordant explanation of likely and withhold elimination sources to living and unfold ideas, yet these are referable constantly patent or
well-mannered open.
There are no mistakes in using the APA mode.
The duty upholds standards of academic truthfulness. accordant explanation of palliable temper, likely and withhold elimination sources to living and unfold
ideas.
There are no mistakes in using the APA mode.
The duty upholds standards of academic truthfulness. sources to living and unfold expend tokens and specifyments. Shows declaration of balbutiation further the clew balbutiation
There are no mistakes
in using the APA mode.
The duty upholds standards of academic truthfulness. sources to living and unfold tokens and collocation specifyments. Shows big declaration of balbutiation further the clew balbutiation
There are no mistakes in using the APA
Style.
The duty upholds standards of academic truthfulness.

Author: Julie Green